If you've ever been through a city you might have noticed tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They appear like tiny boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your mobile.
The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
A Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based upon scientific research that show that RF energy could be harmful to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It's typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies and has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This can lead to various possible harms, like the appearance of skin conditions like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged over 1 cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a cell phone, then you're aware that the safest distance from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is because the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the farther your location from the tower.
Although how to protect yourself from 5g radiation may sound like an ideal idea however, people who live close to towers could be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that people who lived within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significantly more health complaints than those living further away from the antennas.
But, the study showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues.
This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communications, may be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. https://te.legra.ph/Guard-Yourself-From-Electromagnetic-Fields-By-Putting-on-Certain-Clothes-03-23-5 is crucial to know because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as entry of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the biggest organ in the human body and is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on numerous assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. This includes the false assumption that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal penetration into the body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals as well as the effect on the body of short bursts caused by RF pulses. These assumptions do not correspond with current knowledge of the biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure standards.
Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict their exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents may cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This can lead to the risk of having adverse health adverse effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.